Javelin 2. Engine mount removed from hull.
The (removed) heavy wooden engine mounting plate was pictured just before being consigned to the bin to show how little of the woven glass fibre tape had been 'wetted" to make a good secure bond to the hull.
Not having such a good bond between the motor mount and the hull was a bonus for myself as it made getting it out much easier than it could be been.
The application of the epoxy however, was much more "successful" than the glass fibre had been, as a lot of epoxy resin was smeared over all the retaining nuts and the screw and bolt heads - and this did bond very well and is taking a lot longer to remove.
I have not yet been able to remove all the epoxy that is still covering the slotted screw heads and screw threads that I will need to do before I can remove the Merco 61 safely from the heavy metal plate that it is fixed onto.
Looking at the installation of the motor, I am wondering just how much this engine could have been run as it would not have been very secure and it was not aligned very well with the prop shaft.
The driving ball on the end of the prop shaft and its mating socket attached to the engine flywheel shows no sign of wear - the black finish is still unmarked on both.
The heavy duty M5 prop shaft does not show any signs of "play" in the bearings either, and I would have expected to find badly worn bearings if a 10cc engine had been running with this set-up.
The Merco 61 is badly corroded, and just about anything else that is metal in the boat has corroded too, so maybe this Javelin was abandoned quite some time ago without actually ever being run after the Merco engine was fitted?
When I finally get the engine removed from is mounting plate, I will de-gunk it and melt the solidified castor out and the strip it and oil it to see what condition it is like inside.
I have a feeling that whoever built the boat was not the same person who "installed" the motor - possibly a new owner at a later date? The boat itself does seem to be quite solid and well made.
PICTURES.
Note the angle of the engine mounting on the heavy duty metal plate - the rear of the engine mounting lugs are not touching the surface of the steel mounting plate, but the front of the lugs are. This has the affect of "ramping-up" the mounting angle of the motor - but it does not support it very well and puts a lot of extra strain on the unsupported cast motor lugs.
The motor is not mounted centrally in the heavy duty mounting plate. Note the level of corrosion on the flywheel.
The wooden frame also had the metal mounting plate angled upwards at the rear (!) giving a second ramping-up of the wooden base plate suggesting that it was mounted at entirely the wrong angle - far too flat !
Bob.
▲
โฉโฉ
No likes yet
This member will receive 1 point
for every like received