Orca the final cast member
Followers (7)
- Commodore-HGold
- DuncanPBronze
- WolleSilver
- jumpuglyGold
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
One thought I had was will the towing vessel be up to the job in bad weather or will the shark rebel and go its own way?
Rogal thanks for the entertainment regards ChrisG
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
We'll have a whip round to get you a bottle of Original Taste.😉
Can't recommend Diet Coke. Not much real difference in calories and various studies indicate adverse health effects from the synthetic sweeteners used.
Apart from that it tastes bl***y awful and makes terrible Cuba Libre😝
"If I used the whole internal volume as a ballast tank I would loose the buoyancy of the foam, catch 22".
The mass of the foam involved is negligible compared with 1.6kg.
I don't think that would make a significant difference Rogal. Remember, it's the submerged volume that accounts for the displacement, and swim depth. So I don't think that Captain John Yossarian's psychological problems are applicable here😉! (Yes I have seen the film and I have the original hardback book by Joseph Heller.)
You have already proven that you need 1.6kg to get Jaws to float where you want it to.
Add a few grams to compensate for the loss of the interior foam if you wish but I wouldn't bother. Mass involved is negligible compared with 1.6kg.
More important is most likely the angle of incidence of Jaws' lateral fins.
So I totally agree with Andi1, until you try towing Jaws to see if he swims, dives or porpoises you are working in the dark. A negative (downward) angle will force him under, a positive angle will force him to surface. Possibly causing him to leap above the surface (depending on the speed) and diving back down again, i.e. porpoising . Ditto repeato! Would be fun to watch though😀 But perhaps not what you are looking for. So aim for neutral incidence, i.e. horizontal.
My recommendation would be to go with ca 1.6kg (140-145cc) lead within the body.
Would either need 4 more slots like the one you have already made.
Or one plug of 4cm diameter by 11.25cm length.
Much easier to accommodate than 1600cc of water👍
Which would need a cylinder of about 10x20.5cm.
In most boating lakes a false bulb under the ventral will be visible when near the shore and detract from the visual effect and swimming - added drag! Also when on display on shore. Aggro mounting and demounting! We don't want to give away our little secrets do we?😉
Your problem reminds me strongly of a similar snag I had with my 1/72nd scale dynamic diving Type 1A U-Boat, from Krick LoA 107cm.
Built according to instructions she floated too high, despite two 6V 4Ah SLAs, dive planes were still above water☹️
Just like you I draped weights over the hull 'til she floated right.
Then milled hull compartments fore and aft to accommodate corresponding weights of lead.
Hull construction was 'bread and butter', i.e. 4 planks of 2cm thickness.
On sea trials the dive planes would still not push her under but just threw up huge 'moustaches' of water. Spectacular but not exactly true to original😐
I then did some research at the Deutsches Museum here in Munich, where U-1 is on display with the starboard hull plating removed to expose the interior, and bought a helpful book about U-Boat designs, with scale plans. This told me that the Krick dive planes were too small.
So I made a new set. Still to be trialled as most unfortunately shortly thereafter U25 suffered a severe collision with the workshop floor😮😠 Subject for a future Blog😉
Bon chance mon ami🤞looking forward to your progress reports / trials videos👍
Schlaf gut!😴
Cheers, Doug😎
Orca the final cast member
I'm not a biologist, much less a marine biologist (my biology and chemistry teachers and I reached a mutual conclusion that it would be better if we amicably parted company and I devoted the thus freed up time to my strengths; physics and applied maths, with German and English Lit/Lang on the side.)
So I don't know how fish and other aquatic creatures manage that. A question of scale and evolution I suspect. They are mostly more concerned with pressure equalisation I would think. Implosion at depth or explosion near the surface would be most unfortunate.💥
No, I took the simple pragmatic engineer's view.
As soon as I read Rogal's post it struck me that a mass of 1.6kg of water would occupy a volume of 1.6lt or 1600cc.
This immediately called to mind my 1.5lt bottle of the said Coke on my bar (used for my Cuba Libre😋😋), which I measured. Length 10" (25.4cm), excluding tapered part of the neck, mean diameter 3.5" (radius 4.5cm).
Volume of a cylinder is V=πr²h. Thus V=(22/7)x4.5²x25.4cm³. =1615.87818cm³ (cc).
As near as dammit 1.6lt. The rest of the Coke is in the tapered neck of the bottle.
The largest recorded white shark is 20.9' (6.4m) a female!
Now I don't know how big Rogal's shark is but at 1/16th scale the big mamma would be about 40cm long. Alas I can find no data on the girth of such a monster munching machine.
Interestingly the females are generally larger than the males. EEK😮
Male great whites on average measure 3.4 to 4.0 m (11 to 13 ft) in length, while females measure 4.6 to 4.9 m (15 to 16 ft).
Comparing volumes of other potential ballast materials is a simple matter of dividing the volume of 1.6kg of water by the relative density of the other material; e.g. lead 11.34 g/cm³.
Required volume thus being 1600/11.34=141cm³. much easier to fit to the model shark.
Hope that clarifies my dumb engineer's thinking for you Chris.
Cheers, Doug😎
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
This is interesting and difficult for me to get my head around, is the problem because of the material the shark is made of which has a high buoyancy level, subs and many mammals and fish use water to retain their preferred level in the water without looking excessively pregnant, why should this model be different?
This is not me doubting your expertise but my need to know and understand.
Thanks ChrisG
Orca the final cast member
Don't like to be the bearer of bad news (please don't shoot the messenger!)
But I don't think that'll work with water☹️ unless you want to make the shark look like it's pregnant with sextuplets!
1.6kg of lead (density 11.34 g/cc) has a volume of 0.141lt. (141cc)
Water (density 1g/cc) would have a volume of 1.6lt. (1600cc)
About the size of a 1.5 lt bottle of Coca Cola Original taste.😮
To reduce the volume further you could try the following (assuming that you win the lottery)-
Tungsten or gold, density 19.3 g/cc; volume
Total cost ~€104.000.
Tungsten less than $1 / ounce, (
Osmium, density 22.59 g/cc; volume
Total cost €2.161.000.
An interesting conundrum, need to go lie down in a dark room to cogitate that🤕
BTW: What size is the shark; LoA and mean diameter?
Cheers, Doug😎
Orca the final cast member
Regards ChrisG
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
A more complex idea could involve a gyro mounted in jaws so the lateral fins change angle depending on tilt each fin could be controlled by a separate servo and two gyros so jaws would automatically adjust to maintain even straight flow, both vertically and horizontally, obviously he's a fun idea and you may not want to go that far, but just passing my thoughts on I love the 'odd things' I've sourced some wood for my IngaIV masts, recycling scrap using old Victorian washing rack lathes if they are ok to use🙂
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
Orca the final cast member
Liked by
Loading…