Hi Roy, I'm responding to your concerns about the content of the messages and the topic of the thread.
If I translated your opening sentence correctly:
"Sorry, you're losing me on this thread. The heading is tools and equipment," you're wondering why we switched from tools to materials.
Let me explain.
The topic is actually "The tools/equipment of the ship modeler."
Initially, I wanted to know which tools you think are most useful for ship modeling.
I also asked if, in your opinion, it was possible to build an entire model with just three tools (in which case, I wanted to know which), or with five or seven.
Finally, what was your ideal complete kit?
For example, I maintain that with just three tools it's possible to build an entire model, but not design it, and as long as it's a complete kit of a static RC model.
I won't repeat all the content of the messages here (just reread them if you want to understand), but there were some very interesting, albeit conflicting, opinions.
We then added a list of tools for dynamic RC modeling.
However (note here, this is the crux of my explanation), right from the first messages, some participants included materials in addition to tools and utensils.
I didn't scold them for going off-topic (I never do because I think it's rude and impolite to do so, and because I don't consider digressions to be a negative thing in a forum), but I promised myself I'd address the topic of materials separately, at the end.
Instead of opening a separate topic, I placed it at the end of this one, but I did make one clarification.
In fact, I wrote at the beginning of my last message: "To complete the overall picture, instead of creating a separate topic, we could create a sort of spin-off on the materials used by naval modelers."
Rereading the entire topic, I still find the content of the messages very interesting.
I hope I've clarified the reason for the digression, and thank you for sharing your thoughts.
▲
โฉโฉ
No likes yet
This member will receive 1 point
for every like received